Seven workloads that stop being an integration project
What people run on it.
Most data work is not one question. It is a graph question, then a table question, then a search, then a vector lookup, on the same facts. Today each of those is a separate store, a separate copy and a separate licence. Here they are one.
1. RAG pipelines
Retrieval that keeps the relationships
- You embed your documents, and you also keep what they are attached to: the contract they belong to, the person who signed it, the ticket that cites them.
- Retrieval starts as a vector lookup and continues as a walk: the neighbours of the hit, and the neighbours of those.
- The chunks, the vectors and the graph are the same store, so nothing is copied between a vector database and a graph database to answer one question.
- Agent memory belongs here too: one shared memory layer that outlives a process. Durability across machines comes with clustering.
2. Legal
A matter is a graph, not a folder
- Matters, parties, contracts, clauses, obligations and dates are all connected, and the useful questions follow the connections: which obligations fall on us if this clause is triggered.
- Full text search, the document itself and the relationships between documents are one lookup.
- Everything stays on hardware you control, which is usually the condition of the work.
- History is kept rather than overwritten, so you can ask what a matter looked like on a date.
3. Banking
Accounts, counterparties and the paths between them
- Customers, accounts, transfers and counterparties form a graph, and the questions are paths: how money moved from here to there, in how many steps.
- The same store holds the transaction tables, the customer records and the documents, so a path question does not become an export.
- Long histories stay queryable instead of being aged out into a second system.
- Runs inside the bank's own perimeter, with no call out to anyone.
4. Investments
One store for holdings, prices and the paper behind them
- Positions, instruments, issuers and ownership chains are relationships: who ultimately owns what, and through which vehicles.
- Price and time-series data sit beside that, so exposure questions do not span two systems.
- Research notes, filings and memos are searchable in the same place as the numbers they discuss.
- Yesterday's view is still there, because history is kept rather than replaced.
5. Trading
Ticks and relationships in one place
- Market data arrives continuously and is kept as a stream you can replay, not only as a table you summarise.
- Instruments, venues and books are related, so a question about exposure is a walk, not a join across exports.
- Analytics run over columns of numbers in the same store the stream is written to.
- What the system saw at a point in time is recoverable, which is what audit and post-mortem actually need.
6. Utilities
The network, its telemetry and its history
- The physical network is a graph: assets, feeders, substations, meters, and what depends on what.
- Telemetry arrives as a continuous stream from those assets and stays attached to the asset that produced it.
- An outage question is a walk: what is downstream of this failure, and who is affected.
- Records go back years without moving old data into a second system.
7. Tech
Your own product's data, without the integration project
- Application data, documents, search, embeddings, events and metrics land in one store with one interface.
- One thing to run, back up and reason about, instead of a graph database beside a document store beside a search cluster beside a vector index.
- It installs on your own servers with one command, and the first node is free forever, so evaluating it costs a machine and an afternoon.
- Clients for the languages you already use.